Day 32 Rima (five)

How can it be that 'they' were harassing me when the correspondence was 99% traveling out from me?

Going by that - are the NZDSOS also harassers? 

Citizen journalists. Are they harassers?

Our nurses - who, after accepting being mandated out of work (just in case the official decision was correct), would love to go back to serve. Are our kindest nurses harassers?

The few brave souls who refused to mask up - because that was their way of expressing a good citizen conscience. Are they harassers?

Graham Philip, whose alleged crime we're not allowed to know. Stuck in jail, treated worse than hardened criminals. Is Graham harassing us while he awaits a delayed trial? Did he harass anybody to warrant his being denied bail? Did he ever harass anybody?

The Doctors Speaking out with Science letters remind me of the kind I used to write to Church leaders. I recognise the sheer frustration and the repetitive pleading for
                              common sense.

The many letter writers, constantly crying out to this government and this media that are no longer ours. Harassers?

Blair - Stuff's silence is abusive to the community, and you are complicit.

As a grandfather, you'll be chuckling away that there was this nobody woman who thought that you, the great journo with a mandate from the dear leader, were following her stuff.

Yes, I do think that.

Prove me wrong.

Get your story out that you twice said was coming, weeks ago now.

Ease my mind that you do not snoop on me regarding all my insignificant stuff.
Let me see you reporting all the candidates' views accurately and snide free.

Offensive

On the offensive

This time, for the first time ever

Tis only for a few weeks

Compared with those dreadful years.....

.....this is a snap.

It's the funny season, and truly fun, except for winding up Rach. That's sad.

My complete email to Rach Bailey this avo, preceding her next tirade.
Hope dies again -

Subject: With respect
Hi Rach,

I saw you at -----  funeral. You spoke well.

Wish I could be that confident!

You are on my mind because of my mayoralty candidacy.

I'm sharing my testimony via a public campaign diary. The media are not playing fair and I've got to share the best I can.

I'm giving you the link because our radio saga is mentioned.

I write a lot about my political views regarding All Us Moderates and Socialism of the capital S.

I wish you could have seen me standing up for a sole voice at the Youth Forum. The Socialist bloc were shutting down a brave person's question.

It's a funny old world. I get the feeling you would have approved of my behaviour that night!

I hope you will read my diary with an open mind. If so, go in order from the beginning.

I am going for gold, and you may be unhappy about some things I say.

I'm always here for you, but only if you are genuine with me, and not until after this campaign season is over.

It's my belief that ------- hurt your mind all those years ago.

I am asking you now, privately, to pull out of your candidacies. (I'm aware off the SGHS board running and the Bluff board.)

You were instrumental in my voice being cancelled. Your behaviour caused disruption to my life and great alarm for our community. This was unacceptable, as I made clear to you in our private communications.

Kind regards

Jacqueline Walter

[I forgot to say earlier in my diary that I had also called for Bailey's resignation from Radio Southland, after her personal attacks got too much coupled with her getting back to work and continuing as though nothing had happened.]

Followed by my complete email to Ludlow, and forwarded to Sir Tim our Mayor.
Hope fluffs it's feathers -

Subject: Pull out
Darren,

A while ago I called for your resignation from our community access radio. Of course, that was never going to happen - you said so, so it was so.

And so, this time, I am saying that it is only fair on our community that you step away from your mayoral and council candidacies - before 'The Great Debate' where you've been promised more exposure than the likes of me.

If you are not too busy drafting rules for others' behaviour around the council table, feel free to offer me a civilised and non waffling response, with all the trustees in tow minus Sheree and Peter.

Who are the trustees? I need their names for my public campaign diary.

I gave you that link, then I deleted - oh, the vacillations! 

I'm trying to remember all my past lessons with bullies and am briefly worried about my giving the link to Rach.

Perhaps that was unwise. Rach is a bully. But - there are tiny bullies and quite little bullies, and then there are big bullies like yourself, and Soper is adamant that girls must stick together.

So - ask around if you require to see my campaign diary.

Jacqueline Walter

Rach wants that Darryl would force me into getting help for my mental health. She then sided with Jackson and Fallow and hopes that I'll get done over under the digital harmful act. She accused me of threatening Fallow's son. No mention of Ludlow though.

Yeah, if Darryl would like to do something extra for my well being, I need my own gear, and space. Digit tips get sore writing on my digital device, on the offensive against Socialist devices for All Us Moderates.

I'm going to say something provocative now. Be patient with me aums, if you want -

I have begun to wonder if the poor mental state of our nation is mainly due to the fact that we have a disproportionate number of women policy makers who have in the past utilised abortion services for their perceived convenience.

Rach Bailey is simply another politician who is harsh with Kiwi families. After her initial threatening tone it appears she had a wee think. Her second message was about her loveliness and good deeds and nice hopes for me after all - on the condition I get help for the stress she's trying her darnest to cause me.
"I'm glad it wasn't a threat. Michael would still be quite right to hold you accountable via the Harmful Digital Communications Act for all you have said, however. Blair also."

Oh no, I just remembered that Rach is not 'she'. It has to be 'they' and 'their'. I know this from our earlier correspondence. I remember respecting that detail while writing my complaint.

Stuff, I hate your guts, but I'm still talking to you. If one of you tolerable journos interview this politician, please hold her to this detail. Don't let her change tack just for political expediency. And don't let her say that she is no longer a politician nor a journalist (as she was also at pains for me to know in our earlier correspondence.)
You wouldn't let your favourite leopards change spots, would you? They can, and they do.

I place all the blame upon the Green Party. If it weren't for that lot, Rach may have been able to get clear of Rizzi gunk (aka St David's church heroes in this instance).

Rizzi gunk, dear aums.

Keep walking on, away from Rizzi gunk.
I know I've been slow to the party, but better late than never.

We've got this.