Day 41 #5
Bailey's email -
Kia ora Jacqueline,As you have made it clear to NetSafe that you
have no intention of desisting from publishing & communicating
digital harm, they have no option other than to provide a report to the
Invercargill District Court. A Judge will then make an order against you
under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015. Refusing to abide by
the order/s the Judge makes results in a hefty fine, or an up to 6
month jail sentence.
This matter has also been referred to the NZ
Police, who consider your behaviour to be criminal harassment. I will be
working with them over the coming days.
Digital harm is no
joke. Your blog is no campaign diary, it is a hit job on an ever growing
amount of people, with myself & Darren at the heart of it. You are
attempting to cause harm and distress to what is now numerous people,
simply because you feel aggrieved that you could not force a radio
station to broadcast illegal content.
The law is the law. And it seems that the law is a joke to you. It's not.
It
would be greatly in your favour to remove content related to myself and
my media & political colleagues, desist with harassing them also;
publish a retraction, apologise - and get on with campaigning for mayor.
Of your own volition, before enforcement is taken. If you do take the
opportunity to do the right thing yourself - rather than being ordered
to - all parties involved will consider the matter closed.
Regards,
Rach
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why did I not take the Netsafe option?
Because it was just another way for her to harass - like she got her husband Mike to do two nights ago - while all my energy was spent in keeping the peace.
As your mayoral option, I would feel I was taking the coward way out instead of showing you how I can hold my ground for the common good.
Because it was just another way for her to harass - like she got her husband Mike to do two nights ago - while all my energy was spent in keeping the peace.
As your mayoral option, I would feel I was taking the coward way out instead of showing you how I can hold my ground for the common good.
They invite you to mediation,
at the same time showing off their new gagging cloth.
Who are the trustees Rach?
They obviously love you very much.
Who are the numerous upset people?
Could these be leaders who don't want the community to know how nasty and cowardice they are?
Who are the various parties you are speaking for?
Where's your comment, you horrible man Ludlow.
You apologise for these false accusations that I tried to force you into letting me have a go at the station and that I had illegal content.
You make your apology to our community - not to me.
I dropped my sole personal angst about you months ago.
You apologise to our community for this horrible interruption to my campaign which was just starting to get really positive.
Community - how do you feel about your resources being used in this manner?
Where is your comment Ian Pottinger?
You encouraged me in my independent thoughtful and representative ways at the Youth Forum.
at the same time showing off their new gagging cloth.
Who are the trustees Rach?
They obviously love you very much.
Who are the numerous upset people?
Could these be leaders who don't want the community to know how nasty and cowardice they are?
Who are the various parties you are speaking for?
Where's your comment, you horrible man Ludlow.
You apologise for these false accusations that I tried to force you into letting me have a go at the station and that I had illegal content.
You make your apology to our community - not to me.
I dropped my sole personal angst about you months ago.
You apologise to our community for this horrible interruption to my campaign which was just starting to get really positive.
Community - how do you feel about your resources being used in this manner?
Where is your comment Ian Pottinger?
You encouraged me in my independent thoughtful and representative ways at the Youth Forum.