Day 35
PP Story 3

What I believe in foremost,
for our national politics,
is to simply let families be,
while running a strong decisive minimal government
on science and common sense.

Must such a need that we have - for this sort of government - require a sudden change?
Yes, I pretty much think so.
On my first evening at our PP I got to have a long yarn with Kelvyn Alp.
I had been asking around all afternoon for knowledge about the leaders of this gathering.
Many Kiwis there knew how we should run our government.
When I asked somebody - "then who can do it?", they said Kelvyn Alp, and they took me to him.

I gleaned a lot from Kelvyn. Unless I'm mistaken, he was there to do a coup if he could.
He spoke of the nuisance factor of the VFF and the Brian Tamaki contingent (which I never managed to identify for myself at the PP).
Kelvyn viewed all the luvvy dubbing (including Chantelle's work), and the masses of compassionate humanity, as a nuisance.
I think it's likely that he had some military acquaintances ready, but they pulled out.

I'm simply saying this is how I see it.
Kelvyn never straight out said these things.
I'm just putting two and two together for myself. I could be wrong. 

I didn't meet Hannah, but I love her because I really like Kelvyn. Like me, he's been pushing back on the old boys network since his youth.

We do need a decisive change of government.
I came home and figured out the provincial independent politicians 'political suicide' fun way. I think this is as quick as we are going to get for the 'sudden change' we desperately need.

It would have been terrible if we'd had a military coup.
I cannot see that ever working out for our politics of the Majority - for what matters to All Us Moderates.

I think that the military style concept of sorting ourselves out is unsettling the 'freedom fighters' and is feeding the mainstream media with conspirac-'see's. Blair would likely see this and focus on it for my campaign if he could, simply because I'm mentioning it.

The sovereignty Kiwis and the common law adherents are trying to take themselves out of this world, which to my mind is an oxymoron.
Are all things possible - you just have to take charge? I don't think so.
In the mix is the need to deal with outstanding valid historic Maori grievances and the various pack mentalities at play throughout our land.
Then, add in the growing group of wannabe victims.

We are a cacophony which she hears as a symphony.
She is the principal violinist.

I really like Kelvyn because he never gives up. He doesn't get the pip because things didn't turn out the way he wanted. I think that about Brian Tamaki too, although I am very wary. I get the feeling that he could sell his soul, whereas I don't see Kelvyn in that way. Tamaki has religion and a cult following. Kelvyn is not the sort of character who could attract that - he's too genuine, therefore the military coup concept is not a legitimate concern.

I also have the impression of Tamaki that he has coziness with some Police and some present politicians.

I saw Hannah at their Counterspin meeting in Bluff.
I went with a mission; I couldn't have gone without an action to take.
But I felt quite vulnerable; I didn't want to be videoed.
So I wrote of my hope that I'd get a turn, and to be unrecorded and unnamed, and gave the envelope to somebody to pass on.

That was it. I sang my round, had a chance to read my prepared talk and also pushed myself to talk ad lib for a few seconds - all in front of that religious creep.
I came away happy - and wondering why he turned up to a Counterspin meeting. He's not the freedom sort.

Hannah wouldn't know me if she saw me.
I was aggrieved by the trauma Hannah suffered by Police thugs recently (I watched Liz's video), and annoyed by the Herald article sneering at her life choices. Mainstream media stoops very low. I hate it. They let the government away with murder and then use their resources instead to mock innocent New Zealanders minding their own business.

I have seen that Counterspin is linked with the Alex ranter. I saw that man once - the video where he said dreadful things about her - and I'm not interested. I don't find that sort of thing helpful.

I think that the Sovereignty concept is a stage that many Kiwis are going through. I think it's valid and necessary. If it wasn't so, good New Zealanders wouldn't be trying out this pathway.

Blair, just because the Sovereignty style of making sense of life is not the pathway either of us have chosen to travel down, doesn't make it wrong or foolish. Who are we to know? Our fellow Kiwis on this pathway are quite likely wiser than us. They belong with All Us Moderates, don't you think so? Each to their own.
You just have to look at how they live. Are they criminals? Are they unkind?
Or are they servant hearted, clean and good?
Do they use their imaginations and personal resources to gather others to themselves or to challenge others to think for themselves?
Are they hard workers?
How long do they take to pick themselves back up after being abused?
Do they try again because they are foolish - or is it something else which propels them forward?
Could it be love?
Look at how strongly Hannah spoke outside the court recently.
Could you ever be that brave, Blair and Bailey? And Ben?

Do you belong with All Us Moderates B, B&B?
Whether you like it or not - Majority rules in a democracy.

The Majority of us do not want hate speech laws, Rach.
The Majority of us did not want the latest abortion law the way it is, and the way it was done.
All Us Moderates were insulted by the anti smacking laws.
All Us Moderates can cope with others' views. We do not need your laws.

Your law making is a pain. You're full of reckoning that I need the heavy yoke of more law just because I've called you out for destroying my thought processes and right to speech.
This has to stop.
We must disband the Socialists and recognise our Voluntary socialists.

Where's your story B&B?
Remember, it has to sing from the same song sheet, and you the crowd is not safe unless the news is late.
___________________________________

The Great Debate is tonight.
Let's hope that Sheree Carey doesn't kick me out.
She sent us mayoral candidates a school maarm letter.
Apparently, this was prompted by a couple of candidates complaining about the format.
It wasn't me. Honest!
I always knew that it was a light hearted entertainment deal.

But Sheree, you do realise that anybody having their voice forced out of action is no laughing matter?